{
  "name": "J.K. Rowling on X: \"I look forward to the day when medical advances mean newborn babies can be scanned for 'neurological sex'. We could start shoving puberty blockers into them before the mother's even delivered the placenta. https://t.co/v2gs3ao7jw\" / X",
  "url": "https://x.com/jk_rowling/status/1920424614544466407",
  "ogResult": {
    "ogTitle": "J.K. Rowling on X: \"I look forward to the day when medical advances mean newborn babies can be scanned for 'neurological sex'. We could start shoving puberty blockers into them before the mother's even delivered the placenta. https://t.co/v2gs3ao7jw\" / X",
    "ogDescription": "",
    "ogUrl": "https://x.com/jk_rowling/status/1920424614544466407",
    "ogImage": [
      {
        "url": "https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gqa1nF9XYAAxMTh?format=jpg&name=900x900"
      }
    ]
  },
  "ogHTML": "To view keyboard shortcuts, press question mark\n\nView keyboard shortcuts\n\nI look forward to the day when medical advances mean newborn babies can be scanned for 'neurological sex'. We could start shoving puberty blockers into them before the mother's even delivered the placenta.\n\n‘Neurological sex’ makes no more sense than ‘psychological height’\n\nI’ve been psychologically 7’4” since birth.\n\nPerhaps they'll just have a catalogue, from which individuals can build their own child.. complete with spare parts so that, over time, and as their fancy changes, they can transition their children- like they're fashion accessories.\n\nAll in Christ Jesus use all their blood, spirits, souls to ask Jesus Christ to give Elise Oyinkromeineifa a new uterus now permanently that forms and grows around the babies he put in her in a normal way, allow none change it invoking His name authority over creation for all ages\n\nYou say that as a joke but I’ve seen this being suggested seriously before.\n\nThey don't understand, or aren't honest about it, that it would be impossible to have the brain a different gender since it forms in the womb with the rest of the body. The brain is part of the body.\n\nI wonder when the whole argument around gender will come to a more stable place. Seems like it's constant from both sides atm.\n\nDisturbingly, this is the line being pushed by a Professor of neuroscience in the Lancet who (mis)uses DSDs to make his point.\n\nSteph seems nice! \n\n\"Gender identity\" becoming unfashionable so a quick pivot to \"neuro sex\".\n\nAn entire generation of people that will be dependant on medication from cradle to grave would be the dream of pharmaceutical sales teams globally. Much more lucrative than curing many diseases which require one off courses of treatment.\n\nWhat is this “assigned at birth”. Why do we have people talking about this as if no one has any genitalia until someone tells you what you are.\n\nWhen I was growing up in the 70s and 80s there were trans people but nobody cared. Now everything has changed because of the surgeries on kids and taking over our bathrooms!\n\nAbsent a very rare set of circumstances, there is no “assignment at birth.” You are, in the vast majority of cases, XY or XX. The exception is XXY. Malformation of genitals is a mutation addressed by surgery. It is not “assignment.” The wordgames these activists must use…\n\nIt's funny\\* how these men who waited until their late 50's to \"transition\" are so invested in the idea that newborns are trans. \\* By \"funny\" I mean deeply, deeply disturbing .\n\nTrending in United States\n\nRumeysa Ozturk\n\n2,814 posts\n\nBusiness and finance · Trending\n\nGoldman\n\n4,318 posts",
  "ogLength": 2661,
  "youtube": {}
}